GetAITrade is trading-command infrastructure that lets you operate your broker through AI, from web or Telegram, with audit logging and a human verification gate on every order. Phase one is live and tested with real funds: the AI never acts without consent.
Broker connectivity
Connect your broker and route typed, inspectable trade intents.
Human-in-the-loop
Every live order passes an approval gate, safety by design.
Audit everything
Full logging and dry-run-by-default, so nothing happens in the dark.
The breakdown
The problem
Letting an AI talk to a broker is easy to demo and hard to make safe. The demo version places orders from natural language and looks like magic. The production version has to answer a harder question: what happens the one time the model misreads the instruction and the money is real.
The approach
Treat the AI as something that prepares work, never something that commits it. Instructions become typed, inspectable trade intents rather than direct broker calls, and every live order stops at a human verification gate. Dry run is the default, so the safe path is the one you get by doing nothing special.
How it is put together
- Typed trade intents
- Natural language resolves into a structured, inspectable intent object before anything touches a broker API, so the thing being approved is legible.
- Human verification gate
- Every live order requires explicit consent. The system can prepare and explain, it cannot commit.
- Web and Telegram surfaces
- The same intent pipeline behind both, because the approval step has to be identical wherever the instruction came from.
- Audit logging
- Full logging with dry-run by default, so every action has a record and nothing executes silently.
Calls that could have gone the other way
No autonomous execution, at any tier
It is the feature most requested and the one that turns a tool into a fiduciary problem. Not being SEBI registered makes that line non-negotiable rather than merely cautious.
Dry run is the default mode
Defaults are the real safety mechanism. If the safe path needs a flag, someone eventually forgets the flag.
Tested with real funds before widening access
Paper testing hides the failures that only appear with real fills, real slippage and real latency.
